Identitätssuche als Anwalt, Sonntagslektüre

Sind wir Juristen wegen der künstlichen Intelligenz in einer Identitätskrise? Oder ist es allenfalls eine Identitätschance? Spannende Sonntagslektüre von Jordan Furlong:

Und in der deutschen Übersetzung im Legal-Tech-Verzeichnis:

Furlong folgert:

“Because there is plenty for lawyers to do that Generative AI is incapable of doing or replicating. The most obvious is legal agency and representation, using advocacy and negotiation to achieve a client’s outcomes through legal channels and societal institutions. It’s a cliché to say, “An AI will never stand up for you in court,” but it also happens to be true. And it doesn’t have to only be in court.

But there’s much more. A lawyer can develop trusted fiduciary relationships with a client, through which the lawyer accompanies the client on their journeys with support, advice, and wisdom. A lawyer can be a strategic partner and planning resource for individuals and businesses alike, identifying risks and seizing upon opportunities as they arise. A lawyer can design systems for better access to legal remedies, negotiate understandings and agreements that bring an end to conflicts, and safeguard the institutional foundations of justice.”